Last week, Free Market Shooter exposed Natalia Veselnitskaya as an anti-Trump, anti-Putin lawyer with deep ties to the Democratic party.  In fact, despite her visa restrictions, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s DoJ granted her release under “extraordinary circumstances” to the US:

The Moscow lawyer had been turned down for a visa to enter the U.S. lawfully but then was granted special immigration parole by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch for the limited purpose of helping a company owned by Russian businessman Denis Katsyv, her client, defend itself against a Justice Department asset forfeiture case in federal court in New York City.

Instead of looking at Veselnitskaya and her overt connections to the Democratic party, the mainstream media has instead been focused on disproving realities about the lawyer’s true motives and allegiances.  Just one day after Free Market Shooter posted our story, CNN ran a story deliberately trying to discredit sites like Free Market Shooter which brought Veselnitskaya’s past into the limelight:

Continue reading

Yesterday, it was reported that the Canadian government will pay convicted terrorist Omar Khadr CAD$10.5 Million (about $8 million USD) in “damages” for his imprisonment at the US prison facility for terrorist suspects in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.  Fox News provided context on Khadr’s past crimes:

Khadr was 15 when he was captured by U.S. troops following a firefight at a suspected Al Qaeda compound in Afghanistan that resulted in the death of U.S. Special Forces medic, U.S. Army Sgt. First Class Christopher Speer. Khadr, who was suspected of throwing the grenade that killed Speer, was taken to Guantanamo and ultimately charged with war crimes by a military commission.

The Canadian-born Khadr pleaded guilty in 2010 to charges that included murder and was sentences to eight years plus the time he had already spent in custody. He returned to Canada two years later to serve the remainder of his sentence and was released in May 2015 pending an appeal of his guilty plea, which he said was made under duress.

When you’re talking the type of individuals released from Guantanamo Bay, clearly you’re dealing with extremely dangerous terrorists that often return to the battlefield.  But it isn’t every day you equate that with paying a convicted terrorist for his “hardship” suffered at the hands of a government… that isn’t even the one paying out the settlement.

Continue reading