According to recent polling by Elabe, he would take 65 per cent of the vote in a second-round run-off against Le Pen.
It is expected that Macron – a centrist – should be able to attract a wider spectrum of second-round voters than Le Pen, pulling in left-leaning voters from Hamon and Mélenchon as well as those leaning to the right that voted Fillon in the first round.
It appears oddsmakers are ignoring recent geopolitical history in addition to their own prior handicapping mistakes. Again, The Telegraph makes the following astute observation:
A word of caution: just because a candidate won the first round, it doesn’t mean that they’re going to win the presidency.
But they subsequently follow up with a false claim:
For those who have lost faith in political polling, asking people who are prepared to put their money where their mouth is the best way to predict elections.
After Brexit, the election of Donald Trump and the 2015 General Election, many now believe that political betting markets can better predict elections, relying on the wisdom of a crowd of punters to sort and weigh all the probabilities.
Though the Brexit odds flip-flopped prior to the event, oddsmakers generally price the “remain” odds far higher than the “leave” odds. As covered by Free Market Shooter, President Trump was heavily underpriced relative to Hillary Clinton, leaving many (including myself) to believe his chances were far slimmer than they actually were, as his big win demonstrated.
And still, both Brexit and Trump had higher win probabilities at all times prior to voting than Le Pen’s are current odds. Amazingly, even liberal rags have drawn the parallels between Le Pen and Brexit/Trump, saying Le Pen could be in line for a Trump-like upset of Macron.
Even if it is a sucker’s bet, the risk/reward on Le Pen is almost too good to pass up. If you were (somehow) able to bet Le Pen at the Betfair listed percentage of 10.1%, you would be getting almost 9 to 1 on your money wagering on a continuation of an existing populist trend in elections.
Don’t forget the liberal magazines who put the odds of Hillary’s win at 98% (or higher). A very similar trend is being exhibited here, with the MSM counting their chickens before they’ve hatched. Though they are completely independent events, oddsmakers have once again fallen for the pollsters, and are pricing odds in a similar fashion.
With such an outsized payoff to the upside, it appears that Macron’s early victory parade has opened up a potential low-risk dart throw wager opportunity on Marine Le Pen, especially for those who think populist trends are going to continue globally.